Tuesday, July 15, 2008

How much should be paid for returned goods?

Returns are undesirable and might hurt, but once they exist have to be managed. It is necessary to design sound operational processes for reversal logistics, quality control, rework and scratch management, but also it is crucial to set the correct price that will be paid for the returned goods. Setting the price that will be paid to dealers and or customers for the goods that return to the factory or the warehouse, can become an strategic tool if managed purposely. It is necessary to consider at least the following aspects:

1. Costs: Does in average the value of the returned goods cover the price paid and the cost of managing returns. How much is the company willing to spend for accepting returns?

2. Costumer Satisfaction: Do customers see that the offered price for returns is fair?.Has been communicated correctly the return policy that will be applied? Does it contribute to create a loyal customer base?

3. Logistic Coordination of the Channel: By setting the price for returned goods the supplier acts as a channel coordinator as influences the behavior of retailers. If the supplier proposes a full buy back policy for all unsold items, he strongly promotes high inventory levels at the retailer point. In the other extreme, if the supplier does not accept returns for unsold or perished items, retailers will work with tight inventories.

4. Profit Sharing through the Channel: Companies that work in some sectors such as newspapers, video rental and perishable goods use the pricing of returned goods for increasing the revenue and profit of the total chain as well as to allocate the “right” amount of gain to each participant of the channel. Some publishers, movie studios and food producers offer their customers very favourable pay back conditions for returned goods and counterbalance the supported cost by agreeing on revenue sharing contracts that allow them to capture part of the additional revenue that comes from having enough inventory at the retailer during peaks of demand.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Structural Innovation

Restructuring is one of the levers that companies use to innovate and change the course of action to improve results. By changing structure, companies change the way to operate and develop new business models that allow them to remain competitive at capturing, creating and delivering value.

During times of economic downturn, many companies fail at executing its strategy and engage in restructuring and downsizing processes. In many cases they have limited leeway and can not consider other forms of innovation and change such as the adoption of breakthrough technologies that often would entail higher risks and require long term investments. They have to adopt straight measures aimed to increase productivity.


None less, structure innovation is not free risk and sometimes companies may find them selves, after long periods of hard work, at the place where they started. To avoid that, companies have to make sure that reinforce structural change with a sound organizational change program.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Managing Innovation Projects

To successfully manage innovation, often it is necessary to adjust the project content and structure to the specific needs of the company and circumstances. However, when I am immersed in innovation projects, I always try to distinguish three stages in the project. Stages which require different contributions, attitudes and efforts.


FIRST: Identify and Classify new ideas.
This is a creativity oriented stage. The objective here is to obtain ideas that have the potential to become innovations.




SECOND: Evaluate and select ideas.
This is an analytic stage. The objective now is to select the ideas that best match with the company strategic and operational interests, needs and resources.



THIRD: Develop an implementation plan and put it in practice.
This is an operational stage. The objective is to prepare and implement an operating plan to cleverly bring the selected idea/s to the customers arena.

Thursday, May 12, 2005

Lecture -9. Organizing for Innovation II

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Thursday, May 05, 2005

Innovation Ideas and Projects. May 5 & 12 th.

Please post the ideas presented in class.

Lecture - 8. Organizing for Innovation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Thursday, April 28, 2005

April 28th. Nutribest Case

The case team reports are to be posted to the blog by WEDNESDAY 27TH 20:00 PM.

The report should be based on the method we used in class: Lists of (1)facts, (2)Problems, and (3)recommendations.

During the class of thursday 28th, we will discuss and solve the case.

Good Weekend,

Ramon Prat

Lecture - 7. Strategies for Innovation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

29

30

31

32